SeveraDAO Security delivers human-led penetration testing for web applications, APIs, external attack surfaces, and smart contracts. You receive evidence-backed findings, realistic business impact, and remediation priorities your team can act on.
Security work and responsible vulnerability disclosure involving organizations across software, consumer technology, industrial systems, and digital infrastructure.
TP-Link
HORNBACH
Surfshark
Seznam
G DATA
Smartly
Linear
thermondo
CoderPad
Checkmk
HOSTAFRICA
Websupport
DesignCrowd
Kiln
DatoCMS
Stainless
Organization names and logos are the property of their respective owners. Inclusion reflects completed security work or responsible disclosure and does not imply endorsement, sponsorship, affiliation, or an ongoing commercial relationship.
Each engagement is scoped around your architecture, threat model, access level, and business priorities. A written proposal follows a short scoping review.
For customer-facing products, internal portals, administrative surfaces, and business-critical workflows.
For REST and GraphQL APIs supporting products, mobile applications, partner integrations, and multi-tenant systems.
For teams that need to understand what is publicly reachable and which weaknesses create meaningful entry points.
For focused Solidity scopes where access control, accounting correctness, trust assumptions, and exploitability matter.
The result is more than a vulnerability list. Findings are documented so leadership can understand exposure and engineers can reproduce and fix the issue.
Key attack paths, systemic themes, and priorities for decision-makers.
Affected assets, reproduction steps, proof, prerequisites, and impact.
Practical fixes organized by severity, urgency, and engineering context.
Direct debrief, questions after delivery, and optional validation of fixes.
Methodology is adapted to the target rather than forced into a generic checklist. Established standards provide coverage and consistent reporting where applicable.
Confirm assets, access, exclusions, test windows, communication paths, and Rules of Engagement in writing.
Map the attack surface, test controls, follow realistic abuse paths, and manually validate exploitable conditions.
Deliver prioritized findings, walk through material risk, answer implementation questions, and validate fixes when included.
Share the target type, environment, timing, and why the assessment is needed. You will receive focused follow-up questions and a written proposal if there is a fit.
A short description is enough to start. Sensitive details can move to an agreed secure channel after initial contact.
Commercial and technical details are confirmed in a written proposal and scope document.
A written quote is prepared after scope, architecture, access level, target count, and timing are understood.
An executive summary, technical findings with evidence, impact, severity, and prioritized remediation guidance.
Findings can be mapped to relevant technical standards where useful. A penetration test is not itself a certification or compliance attestation.
Yes. Validation of remediated findings can be included in the proposal or arranged after delivery.
Yes. Testing can focus on one application, API, workflow, external surface, or smart contract system.
Only after the client confirms ownership or authority and the targets, boundaries, and Rules of Engagement are approved in writing.
